Achieving the Best Possible Outcomes for Cardiovascular Emergencies - Part 3 of 3

What could be accomplished with Two Dollars?

In Ontario roughly 20% of the population is age 55 or older. In a typical LHIN (Local Health Integration Network) with a population of 1,000,000 this represents about 200,000 people. A budget line based on $2.00 per age 55+ resident dedicated to raising awareness amongst older adults of how to recognize and respond to cardiovascular emergencies would represent an annual expenditure of $400,000 of the best money ever spent on healthcare.  Provincially that’s about $6.4 million out of the $49 billion healthcare budget.

Managing the care and rehabilitation of patients that have experienced Heart Attack and Stroke represents a multi-million dollar cost to any healthcare system. Due to the extremely high cost of treating patients that have experienced the worst possible outcomes every healthcare jurisdiction invests heavily in developing facilities and teams of specialists that are tasked with achieving the best possible outcomes. The tools and the techniques that these interventional teams use are at the leading edge of medical technology representing the culmination of billions of dollars of worldwide research and development costs. The programs are so expensive and highly specialized that in Ontario only one in eleven (15 of 165) hospitals are set-up to perform the cardiac procedures.

What I find fascinating is that the same billions of dollars of research has shown conclusively that the independent variable with the strongest association to good outcomes for Heart Attack and Stroke victims is time, specifically the time from symptom onset to definitive treatment. In-hospital improvements to programs may result in incremental improvements in time to treatment but the potential for quantum improvement lies entirely in the pre-hospital realm and specifically with the lay public - the patients, their families, coworkers and friends.

The gold standard treatment times of 90 minutes for Heart Attack (STEMI) and 180 minutes for Stroke will only be achieved consistently when the majority of the adult population is knowledgeable around recognizing and responding to observed symptoms. Every time the gold standard time to treatment is achieved the healthcare systems saves tens perhaps even hundreds of thousands of dollars. We should also pause to consider the human cost of missing the 90 or 180 minute window.

Every month I teach CPR to between 50 and 100 older adults across Ontario and we typically spend up to an hour discussing Heart Attack and Stroke recognition and response.  The vast majority of the adults I meet are somewhat aware of the symptoms, totally unaware of how to respond when symptoms are observed, unaware of the importance of a timely response and most importantly unaware of the life altering difference in patient (and family) outcomes for those that are treated within the gold standard timeframes.  Especially with adult learners explaining the why of things, in this case significantly better patient outcomes,  is the most effective way to deliver the message.

If every LHIN in Ontario hired one fulltime Health Promoter, with an appropriate program budget, dedicated to raising awareness amongst older adults of how to recognize and respond to cardiovascular emergencies measuring the impact of their efforts, in both economic and human terms, would likely be the best news story that many LHIN’s would have to report on each year.  Through stakeholder networking to create opportunities for workshops and presentations and effective use of both traditional and social media a little money could go a long way to disseminating the “time is of the essence” message.  Realizing the economic benefit of increasing the number of Heart Attack and Stroke patients that arrive at Ontario’s world class facilities within the target time from symptom onset is some of the lowest hanging fruit in the healthcare system

Note: The task of educating the public on Heart Attack and Stroke Recognition and Response is entirely separate and distinct from promoting lifestyles that contribute to good cardiovascular health.  Programs aimed at lifestyle modification will have little or no effect on “symptom onset to definitive therapy times” for patients experiencing a cardiovascular emergency.

Achieving the Best Possible Outcomes for Cardiovascular Emergencies - Part 2 of 3

What does the best possible outcome for Heart Attack or Stroke look like?

I was at The Cottage Life Show in Toronto last weekend, promoting CPR and AED’s (Automated External Defibrillator) for the family cottage.  A couple stopped by the booth to ask a few questions. Both were healthy and happy and I would have never guessed that less than a year ago he had suffered a significant myocardial infarction. The reason he looked and felt so good – immediately upon the onset of symptoms 911 was called and he was taken directly to the cardiac catheterization lab at Sunnybrook Hospital and emergency angioplasty was performed well within the 90 minute target time.

Over the past six years I have met many patients that have been treated within the 90 minute door to balloon time (DTB) window that is the target for all STEMI (ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction) programs and it would be impossible to tell that any of them had recently had a significant MI.  Most patients that make the 90 minute DTB window have suffered little or no loss of heart function and little or no permanent damage to the heart muscle. Return to a good quality of life often takes only a few weeks and return to work often occurs even sooner than many patients would have hoped for.  Many STEMI patients have told me that they “feel better now than they have in a couple of years.”

Last summer I met a neighbour walking his dog.  As he approached I didn’t even notice his slight limp and wouldn’t have guessed he had recently suffered a stroke unless he had told me. His story was similar to the stories of most stroke patients that are home within a few weeks with little or no noticeable deficit – both he and his wife instantly recognized what was happening and wasted no time in calling 9-1-1.  The Paramedics transported him directly to the Regional Stroke Centre where he received thrombolytic therapy within two hours of the onset of symptoms.

These two real world examples are what I would define as “the best possible outcome” for Heart Attack and Stroke. After a short stay in hospital both patients were home, physically and neurologically intact, enjoying a very good quality of life and quite willing to buy green bananas.  

What does it mean for patients, families and taxpayers when the best possible outcome is achieved?

For spouses, children, grandchildren, friends and co-workers to have a person they care about come through an acute cardiovascular event with little or no permanent deficit and able to return quickly to a pre-event quality of life is priceless.

For our overburdened healthcare system the price of not consistently achieving the best possible outcome for heart attack and stroke is one that we can no longer afford to pay. When Heart Attack and Stroke are allowed to run their course and visit the maximum damage upon the patient the result is lengthy hospital stays including many days or weeks in intensive care, the costliest level of care.  Many patients are unable to go directly home but must go to a rehabilitation facility where they re-acquire simple skills needed to manage daily living. Return to anything like their pre-event quality of life, including return to work, may take months or years or may never happen.  Many patients will have an intimate and costly relationship with the healthcare system for the rest of their life. 

The investment required to educate older adults (and for that matter everyone) how to recognize and respond to significant cardiovascular emergencies is miniscule by comparison. In a world where communication and knowledge sharing is omnipotent and omnipresent it astounds me how few of the adults that attend my classes have even a rudimentary knowledge of heart attack and stroke recognition and management. I do know that for two dollars for every adult over age 50 we could go a long way toward providing each of them with the knowledge and tools to achieve the best possible outcome for Heart Attack and Stroke.